Showing posts with label cia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cia. Show all posts

Saturday, May 14, 2011

fukushima haarp nuclear attack by cia, doe & bp

fukushima haarp nuclear attack by cia, doe & bpIn an Exopolitics TV interview, often paired Alfred Labremont Webre interviews radiation expert Leuren Moret on planet Earth as a weapon of war. Webre and Moret believe an international war crimes network lies behind many of the recent HAARP-triggered "natural disasters", including Fukushima. Moret fingers perps in network: the CIA, Department of Energy (DOE) and BP as tools used by London bankers. Moret's highly developed worldview sees London bankers and Queen of England at epicenter of power in Western world.


A murky international war crimes network seeks by means of depop agendas the goal of land and resource grabs. Moret also believes most natural disasters of past decade are "HAARP events". A list of triggered events include: 9/11 New York, Sumatra quake, Hurricane Katrina and Haiti quake. The radiation expert cites often FEMA's Sept 10, 2001 conference, where the agency ranked most likely disasters as a terrorist attack on New York, an earthquake in San Francisco and a hurricane in New Orleans.

Foreshadowing is a concept noted in the interview. Moret finds parallels in these events with prior ones of a similar but smaller scale seen as possible feasibility or "practice runs". US warships were also nearby in these disasters, notes Moret, in an accompanying article by Webre."US Ronald Reagan – As was the case in the HAARP false flag operations of Katrina hurricane, the Haiti earthquake, and the Sumatra earthquake-tsunami, U.S. warships such as the U.S. Ronald Reagan, complicit in the false flag operation, stood by the operation and were an operational part of it."

Perhaps, most interesting, Moret fingers the DOE as running the operation in Japan and provides names in the department: Steven Chu and Steven Koonin. Chu acts in China's interest and Koonin, a former BP employee for the London bankers. Queen of England owns BP reminds Moret. It's a global agenda where sovereignty of nation-states seems only an obstacle to large players. Rockefellers, Moret observes, bought into Japan during the rebuilding after World War II, and points out, SONY is not Japanese--it stands for Standard Oil of New York!

In the most tenuous accusation, Moret fingers CIA for developing Stuxnet worm with Israel's MOSSAD. "The false flag operation involved the introduction of the CIA-Mossad developed Stuxnet virus, causing melt-downs in all nuclear cores within 90 minutes, followed by complete coverup. This was aided by intentionally poor design, as though the power plant were from the beginning a giant nuclear weapon." Is it too far-fetched? Has Stuxnet co-opted operations in nuclear plants to turn them into potential dirty nukes?

On a last count, it's hard to believe Moret, who ".. sees big nuclear power expansion plans globally..", as it seems an uphill battle from here to sell nuclear power? Or is it? Will the international war crimes network simply run roughshod over objections to implement their agenda? It can't be discounted!

A criminal network - doing the dirty work for London bankers and the Queen, in a worldwide conspiracy - seems beyond belief. This writer sees actors as Chu and Koonin, whose interests lie outside the country, making the story believable. The "apparently inept" disaster response in Japan, so reminiscent of New Orleans, only contributes to the suspicion that a conspiracy is afoot - and it's global!

Saturday, January 8, 2011

weapons of mass deception

weapons of mass deceptionMark Pilkington, author of Mirage Men, writes an excellent account of early ufology, from an intelligence point of view, in a Fortean Times article, "Weapons of Mass Deception". Pilkington begins with the Air Forces' "Project Grudge, an early effort "to study" unidentified flying objects (ufos), but intended primarily to suppress public interest. The effort proved successful, until Donald Keyhoe wrote a 1950 article that exposed the Air Force coverup in True Magazine, and later, expanded into a book, "The Flying Saucers Are Real". Keyhoe transformed ufos into a respectable topic, "the era of scientific ufology was born", writes Pilkington.

The ufo myth, as we know it, took form from a series of events, according to Pilkington, the first a film release in September 1951 of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" (link to full film) that "perfectly crystallised" the hopes and fears of the flying saucer movement, what an alien encounter could bring with Christ-like Klaatu's message of peace and his robot enforcer, Gort, capable of destroying the Earth. The film sparked a surge of ufo sightings and many within the armed services, which prompted the Air Force to issue JANAP 146(B), where servicemen could be imprisoned for up to ten years and fined 10,000 dollars for release of ufo information.


Another boost to ufology came from a Aprill 1952 Life Magazine article, "Have We Visitors from Space?", which surprised many by its pro-extraterrestrial message in light of the authors spending a year consulting with the Air Force.  US newspapers carried over 16,000 ufo news items in the first six months of 1952 alone. By this time, ufo phenomena made policymakers nervous, CIA Director Walter B. Smith wrote in a letter, "...problems associated with unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for psycho­logical warfare as well as for intelligence and operations.” Smith’s concerns would prove to be uncannily prescient." The nervousness--the result of a combination of technology and paranoia--that characterized the Cold War with the former Soviet Union. Authorities were at war with ufology.

"On two nights in July 1952, a number of unidentified objects blipped onto radar screens at Washington DC National Airport. At close to midnight on the first night, 19–20 July, seven objects were tracked 24km from the capital city, gradually homing in on the White House at about 160km/h. A bright, orange ball of light was seen from nearby Andrews Air Force Base, making “a kind of circular movement” according to an airman on the scene, before taking off at “an incredible speed” and disappearing. Six bright white, fast-moving lights were also spotted by the pilot of a passenger jet flying in the area," reports Pilkington.

The DC overflights resulted in a media flurry, a press conference called the largest since World War II. The event described by Edward Ruppelt, first head of the Air Force Project Blue Book and coined the term "ufo", as a chaotic affair in his 1956 memoir, "The Report on Unidentied Flying Objects".  A link to a .mp3 recording of Ruppelt's book, which can be downloaded for free, is available here  from Librivox--very nice.

Leon Davidson, a chemical engineer at Los Alamos in the late forties, is the lost prophet of ufology, according to Pilkington.  The engineer joined a ufo group at Los Alamos fascinated by the green fireballs seen in New Mexico.  Davidson came to believe "...secret military tests lay behind these and most other UFO incidents, including the Washington overflights."

Davidson recognized similarities between descriptions of radar blips over Washington DC and those created by electronic counter measures and felt he knew who was behind it. "ECM + CIA = UFO or How to Cause a Radar Sighting" was an essay written by Davidson to expose the intelligence source responsible for the sightings. A great case is made for an intelligence operation by the engineer and points out the DC event was predicted by a CIA scientist and related to Ruppelt just a few days before it occurred!

"So were the Washington UFOs an early attempt to put the galloping ghosts under human control,"  Pilkington asks rhetorically in conclusion?   The author believes the ufo community would look different today if it had paid attention to the lost prophet, Davidson!  Pilkington's conclusion is the sightings are black operations not aliens!  A great read--a story that just keeps on giving!

Sunday, December 26, 2010

mark david chapman: programmed cia hitman?

Phil Strongman writes a new book, "John Lennon--Life, Times and Assassination" and revisits agency involvement in the murder.  The most convincing argument is to follow the money.  "Money never seemed to be a problem for Chapman, but no one has ever explained where it came from. The distinct possibility remains, in Strongman’s opinion, that the secret service was his paymaster."  A young man without visible means, Chapman was able to travel around the world to Japan, the UK, India, Nepal, Korea, Vietnam and China in 1975. 

The portrayed of the 25 year old as a "lone nut" has fallen away as more facts have become known.  Strongman believes more than one shooter had to be involved, it's often cited the number of bullets add up to more than one gun.  The author harbors doubts whether Chapman fired at all?  Outside doorman Jose Perdomo's involvement in the Bay of Pigs, revealed in recent years seems a strong possibility as a participant? 

Mark David Chapman, as a Manchurian Candidate or programmed assassin, is not new however. "Who Killed John Lennon" written by Fenton Bresler, twenty years ago, did an admirable job revealing the mind control aspects of the murder. The unaccounted for layover by Chapman at Chicago O'Hare airport just prior to Lennon's shooting leaves open possibilities.  Bresler suspected that time was used to reassert control over Chapman's mind as he was acting erratically?  Strongman concludes Chapman was likely a stooge and Lennon was assassinated at the behest of right wing fanatics in the political establishment.  Phil Spector feels John Lennon's assassination "was certainly a probability" in very brief interview excerpt on You Tube.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

wikileaks: brought to you by the cia

wikileaks: brought to you by the ciaBrasscheck TV ran, recently, New World Next Week (NWNW), July 29, 2010 episode on the Wikleaks Afghanistan war diaries and said, "these guys nailed it back in July!" The activist website, which features videos, gave the NWNW episode the title, "Wikileaks: Brought to you by the CIA", revealing the website's opinion of the renegade leaking operation.

tarpley's take on wikileaks

tarpley's take on wikileaksWebster Tarpley reveals the self-exposure operation of Wikileaks on the Alex Jones Show recently. Julian Assange is a MK-Ultra zombie, the product of an Australian mind control cult led by Anne Hamilton-Byrne, in Tarpley's view. Assange's peroxide blonde hair color is noted as significant, as the Australian cult members' hair was dyed peroxide blonde or platinum, and reveals his cult ties. Assange is compared to Daniel Ellsberg and may be an expendible intelligence asset? Tarpley summarizes the Wikileaks document dumps, observing there are no damaging references to a George W. Bush or Richard Cheney and concludes they are most damaging to the CIA's enemies. Please take a moment to listen how Julian Assange and Wikileaks may be controlled intelligence assets and the present operation bears similarities to the Pentagon Papers of the early seventies. Tarpley believes Wikileaks is the product of White House information czar, Cass Sunstein. Sunstein pledged government infiltration of extremist groups, some time ago, and wrote the following paper: "Conspiracy Theories". It's must listen and available, here.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

wikileaks is not a psy op?

wikileaks is not a psy op?Anok Black, in a blog entry at www.seismologik.com, offers the reader four reasons why Wikileaks is not a tool of the agenda. Black lists them: 1) it would be irrational and damaging for US government to use Wikileaks to build support for war, 2) it would be ineffective since patrons of Wikileaks already have anti-establishment views, 3) Julian Assange is anti-authoritarian not a CIA asset with supporting links to Assange's personal essays and an archive of Assange's blog, and 4) Wikileaks is not Julian Assange. Non-sequiturs flow from each of the four points. This is from someone who is, ostensibly, finishing a PHD in analytic philosophy!

Readers should ask why defend Wikileaks, because it's exposing injustice worldwide? It doesn't make sense for US government to use a platform such as Wikileaks? The conclusions do not follow from the arguments for each of the above reasons. Wikileaks history is suspicious at best. Where does the money for this project come from and how does Assange pay for his world travels? The only response to Black's blog entry may be the biggest knock against Wikileaks, Julian Assange aside, "...what seems missing from the leaks tells a stronger tale".

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

wikileaks: cyber-cointelpro?

cablegate: wikileaks unveils secret state dept cables
Wayne Madsen reports Asian intelligence sources feel strongly Wikileaks is linked to US computer espionage operations. Wikileaks cries persecution by US intelligence when it is intelligence itself, according to Madsen's sources. Madsen writes in "CIA, Mossad and Soros behind Wikileaks", his sources also view Wikileaks as part and parcel of a cyber-COINTELPRO campaign as proposed by President Obama's information czar, Cass Sunstein. Article provides an amazing detailed history of Wikileaks from making the CIA unhappy by diverting too many funds to the MOSSAD to its move to Iceland, and how it's believed, George Soros is behind it. It's a must read article to appreciate how speculators like Soros operate on the world stage.

Monday, November 8, 2010

cyber command seeks to expand battefield

Gen. Keith B Alexander, NSA Director and Cyber Command chief, seeks to go "full spectrum" with offensive measures in cyberspace. Cyber Command reached full operational status just within the past month, looks to push boundaries according to Washington Post article.  "But current and former officials say that senior policymakers and administration lawyers want to limit the military's offensive computer operations to war zones such as Afghanistan, in part because the CIA argues that covert operations outside the battle zone are its responsibility and the State Department is concerned about diplomatic backlash." Does this mark the twilight of the internet as we've known it these past few years?

Saturday, October 16, 2010

the real you

Tom Burghardt writes in recent article, "When the 'Future' Invades Our Lives. The CIA Funds 'Predictive Behavior Start-Ups," how CIA-backed companies team up to control you. Burghardt's article reads like a Hegelian dialectic. Google is allegedly hacked by Chinese early in 2010 and must "increase its situational awareness in the battlespace". The solution is more data-mining. The chilling result is another startup, Social Intelligence, which data mines to help companies decide whether they really want to hire you? They want to know "the real you". Burghardt concludes it's an Orwellian panopticon "...the grim world order that fear-mongering corporations are rapidly bringing to fruition." Have our lives been reduced to, "hear, speak and see no evil" and add to it "think no evil"?

Monday, September 27, 2010

'ex-cia' head hayden says US should be able to shut down internet

'ex-cia' head hayden says US should be able to shut down internetfrom reuters: Cyberterrorism is such a threat that the U.S. president should have the authority to shut down the Internet in the event of an attack, Former CIA Director Michael Hayden said.

Hayden made the comments during a visit to San Antonio where he was meeting with military and civilian officials to discuss cyber security. The U.S. military has a new Cyber Command which is to begin operations on October 1.

Hayden said the president currently does not have the authority to shut down the Internet in an emergency.

"My personal view is that it is probably wise to legislate some authority to the President, to take emergency measures for limited periods of time, with clear reporting to Congress, when he feels as if he has to take these measures," he said in an interview on the weekend.

"But I would put the bar really high as to when these kinds of authorities might take place," he said.

He likened cyberwarfare to a "frontier."

"It's actually the new area of endeavor, I would compare it to a new age of exploration. Military doctrine calls the cyber thing a 'domain,' like land sea, air, space, and now cyber … It is almost like a frontier experience" he said.

Hayden, a retired U.S. Air Force general, was director of the Central Intelligence Agency during the administration of President George W. Bush from 2006 to 2009.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

tax-funded pentagon software ends up owned by corporations

pentagon is losing the softwar(e)
pentagon is losing the softwar(e)from defense news: The Department of Defense spends tens of billions of dollars annually creating software that is rarely reused & difficult to adapt to new threats.

Instead, much of this software is allowed to become the property of defense companies, resulting in DoD repeatedly funding the same solutions or, worse, repaying to use previously created software.

The lack of a coherent set of policies and regulations for the DoD’s intellectual property has eroded the U.S. military competitive advantage, leading to compromised missions and lost lives. Improvised explosive device countermeasure systems can’t be upgraded rapidly without replacing entire systems; personnel position systems can’t update in real time; billions are wasted on software radios that don’t interoperate.

The byzantine rules governing the military’s intellectual property portfolio use an antiquated rights structure where the contractor always retains copyright, and therefore effective monopoly, control over taxpayer-funded software ideas. By contrast, commercial industry ruthlessly exercises control over its own software ideas.


related: cia software developer goes open source

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

cia & google invest in 'recorded future' of web monitoring

google/cia invest in 'future' of pre-crime
cia & google invest in 'recorded future' of web monitoringfrom danger room: The investment arms of the CIA and Google are both backing a company that monitors the web in real time - and says it uses that information to predict the future.

The company is called Recorded Future, and it scours tens of thousands of websites, blogs and Twitter accounts to find the relationships between people, organizations, actions and incidents - both present and still-to-come. In a white paper, the company says its temporal analytics engine “goes beyond search” by “looking at the ‘invisible links’ between documents that talk about the same, or related, entities and events.”

The idea is to figure out for each incident who was involved, where it happened and when it might go down. Recorded Future then plots that chatter, showing online “momentum” for any given event.

The cool thing is, you can actually predict the curve, in many cases,” says company CEO Christopher Ahlberg, a former Swedish Army Ranger with a PhD in computer science.

Which naturally makes the 16-person Cambridge, Massachusetts, firm attractive to Google Ventures, the search giant’s investment division, and to In-Q-Tel, which handles similar duties for the CIA and the wider intelligence community.

It’s not the very first time Google has done business with America’s spy agencies. Long before it reportedly enlisted the help of the National Security Agency to secure its networks, Google sold equipment to the secret signals-intelligence group. In-Q-Tel backed the mapping firm Keyhole, which was bought by Google in 2004 — and then became the backbone for Google Earth.

This appears to be the first time, however, that the intelligence community and Google have funded the same startup, at the same time. No one is accusing Google of directly collaborating with the CIA. But the investments are bound to be fodder for critics of Google, who already see the search giant as overly cozy with the U.S. government, and worry that the company is starting to forget its “don’t be evil” mantra.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

'how do i delete my facebook account?' query grows in popularity

remember kids:
in-q-tel, the investment arm of the cia, helped fund facebook...

'how do i delete my facebook account?' query grows in popularityfrom read write web: Facebook doesn't make it easy to delete your account, but a growing number of people appear to be turning to Google to find out how to do just that. Google Suggest, the drop-down box that offers suggested search query completions based on absolute and recent upticks of popularity, now guesses that if you start typing "How do I..." that you'd like to know how to quit Facebook. Note that deactivating your account, something that Facebook responds to in a pretty shocking way as well, is not the same as deleting it.

Search maven Danny Sullivan noted the suggestion on Twitter this morning, but a growing number of industry watchers are talking about people deleting their Facebook accounts. Some, including at least two members of our own staff, have already done so. Google Suggest suggestions are often humorous, but the screenshot below is pretty serious stuff.

So how do you delete your Facebook account? Even that is pretty remarkable! According to the #1 search result for the query, which is an unofficial Facebook group page written by someone else, you have to visit facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account. On that page you'll find a delete button. According to said unofficial group, you'll still be able to bring your account back if you log-in within the next two weeks! You won't show up in search results though, neither in Facebook nor in Google. It's as if they can't see you anymore.

"It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself-anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face...; was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime..." -- George Orwell, 1984
For the record, I have not deleted my Facebook account as I enjoy the service too much and feel the need to keep an eye on its innovations and transgressions. You can subscribe to ReadWriteWeb's good news and bad news about Facebook and the rest of the web here on Facebook.

related: facebook's gone rogue; it's time for an open alternative

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

cia head panetta says 'cyber attack could be next pearl harbor'

cyberwar & repression: corporatist synergy made in hell
from sacramento press: Central Intelligence Agency director Leon Panetta told 300 Sacramento Metro Chamber Cap-to-Cap delegates that the next “Pearl Harbor” is likely to be an attack on the United States’ power, financial, military and other Internet systems.

Panetta addressed the Sacramento delegation that includes 43 elected officials and hundreds of business and civic leaders who are in Washington D.C. for the annual program that advocates for the region’s most pressing policy issues. He spoke on Monday, April 19, during the Cap-to-Cap opening breakfast.

Cyber terrorism” is a new area of concern for the CIA, Panetta said. The United States faces thousands of cyber attacks daily on its Internet networks. The attacks are originating in Russia, China, Iran and from even hackers.

The next Pearl Harbor is likely to be a cyber attacking going after our grid… and that can literally cripple this country,” Panetta said. “This is a whole new area of threat.”

But cyber terrorism is just one of four primary missions for Panetta, who took over directing the CIA last year after appointment by President Obama. The CIA is also focusing on counter-terrorism, reducing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and fighting narcotics trafficking.


Al Qaeda is becoming a viscous target, and as CIA and military operations tamp it down in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, the terrorist elements are moving to places like Somalia, Yemen and North Africa—as well changing its tactics, he said.

The president’s direction…is we must dismantle and destroy Al Qaeda and its known elements,” he said. “It’s a fundamental mission….The primary effort takes place in Pakistan and tribal areas. We are now focused on Afghanistan and have increased our presence there.”

Meanwhile, CIA is working to help Iraqis fight Al Qaeda. “Even as our military draws down in Iraq, we’ll keep our presence there…to provide intelligence to the Iraqis so they can secure their own country.”

Worrisome, he added, is how Al Qaeda is “coming at us in other ways.” These include using individuals who have clean records and are not being tracked; individuals who are already in the U.S.A. and in contact with Al Qaeda; and individuals who decided to “self-radicalize” and are easily and quickly recruited as terrorists.

Previously, Panetta served as a congressional representative from the Monterey area, rising to the House Budget committee chair, and then latter as President Clinton’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

I’ve spent most of my life on budget issues,” he said, noting the “work we did eventually produced a balanced budget for the country.” When he’s asked why he took on the job at the CIA, he told the group, “Because considering the size of the federal deficit, I’d rather fight Al Qaeda.”

Thursday, April 22, 2010