After reading "Struggling polar bears out on endangered list", I think it is really sarcasm of some human beings. Which one is more important? Benefit or environment? They put polar bears on the endangered list, but do nothing with them. So, why this US guys made this? The government scientists warned that "two thirds of the species – 16,000 animals – could disappear by 2050 as global warming melts the Arctic sea ice (Struggling polar bears out on endangered list, n.d.)." Is this serious? Yes, I think so, but I have no idea why they can "drilling for oil in the Arctic will continue (Struggling polar bears out on endangered list, n.d)." I think I can understand "Environmentalists claimed a limited victory but were angry that no action will be taken to tackle climate change." If the issue is serious like their saying, it is the irresponsible action for all human and all universal.
Actually i only know a name of Global Warming, and only know it bad for our environment, but i never pay attention on it. This news make me did some research about climate change. These resources shocked me, not only the great damage of global warming, but also the "Swindle" of global warming and the benefit of it changing!!
In 2007, BBC channel 4 broadcasted a documentary
Keep thinking this point and go back to "Struggling polar bears out on endangered list", it's easy to make me thinking US guys really did some murky action, Polar bears set in a emergency condition, but they still drill oil, and their attitude with Kyoto Protocol is quite ambiguous. Is it because global warming is a swindle, or they just for their benefit and betray our environment?
Struggling polar bears out on endangered list, n.d, accessed 3rd May 2011,
Xiao Tan
No comments:
Post a Comment