gcpuzzle
03-10 03:39 PM
As as long as your job title says software engineer and your job description is close enough, you should be fine. Junior .. senior doesn't matter and they are pretty common.
wallpaper Julie Benz is wearing her hair
admin
03-10 08:50 PM
True enough, Dixie. I was hoping that other affected parties would become aware of this site through digg. Even one more contribution through this promotion would be worth it, I think.
Whatever it takes. That's the spirit saiku. We need more and more people who will execute their ideas.
Whatever it takes. That's the spirit saiku. We need more and more people who will execute their ideas.
cjgirish
02-06 02:13 PM
Hello All,
I am in a very sticky situation, my labor is pending @ PBEC with priority date of Jan'2004, which is Non-RIR and filed under EB3 category, based on which I have been getting incremental extensions of H1B (I am already in my 9th year by now). At present I am in the process of changing my filing type to RIR from TR and I was hoping to change the category too from EB3 to EB2, but my employers did not support me since they cannot pay the prevailing wage. I know I can still switch jobs, provided I transfer my H1B (which is valid till Jan�2008) and the new company files my GC immediately, so my questions to fellow victims of PBEC is
� How can I retain my old priority date?,
� Does the job descriptions filed with old labor have to match with job descriptions filed in PERM?
� It will be very tough, since I have almost 12+ yrs of exp in the industry, but my present employer is taking advantage of my situation and he is paying me peanuts, just because he does not want to pay me more, they have filed the papers as EB3. So while filing labor under EB2, can I still maintain my old priority date.
Please guys/gals help me out, I am not sure what to do, since I have already spent almost 3K$ on my GC and If I will be stuck with my employer at such low salary after my labor & I140 gets approved because of the retrogression it will be disaster. So I was thinking it would be better to be stuck with employer, who at least pays me decently and if I can retain my old dates it will awesome.
Regards,
CJG
I am in a very sticky situation, my labor is pending @ PBEC with priority date of Jan'2004, which is Non-RIR and filed under EB3 category, based on which I have been getting incremental extensions of H1B (I am already in my 9th year by now). At present I am in the process of changing my filing type to RIR from TR and I was hoping to change the category too from EB3 to EB2, but my employers did not support me since they cannot pay the prevailing wage. I know I can still switch jobs, provided I transfer my H1B (which is valid till Jan�2008) and the new company files my GC immediately, so my questions to fellow victims of PBEC is
� How can I retain my old priority date?,
� Does the job descriptions filed with old labor have to match with job descriptions filed in PERM?
� It will be very tough, since I have almost 12+ yrs of exp in the industry, but my present employer is taking advantage of my situation and he is paying me peanuts, just because he does not want to pay me more, they have filed the papers as EB3. So while filing labor under EB2, can I still maintain my old priority date.
Please guys/gals help me out, I am not sure what to do, since I have already spent almost 3K$ on my GC and If I will be stuck with my employer at such low salary after my labor & I140 gets approved because of the retrogression it will be disaster. So I was thinking it would be better to be stuck with employer, who at least pays me decently and if I can retain my old dates it will awesome.
Regards,
CJG
2011 Julie Benz Gallery
jamsumfarray
11-16 08:14 AM
How long do they have teh advertisement there in the bec?
wahat goes on from then on?:confused:
wahat goes on from then on?:confused:
more...
permfiling
10-20 10:45 AM
You should take the advice of an attorney. I would recommend Rajiv Khanna. His website is immigration.com. In case india is the only option, you get lactose free stuff as well.
in addition, update your profile.
in addition, update your profile.
arnet
11-21 03:09 PM
thanks
more...
Almond
08-04 10:21 PM
Today, I received an email from USCIS that my EAD application got approved. My receipt date is on the 3rd week of May of 2007. What I don't understand is that the current processing time at NSC for I-765(EAD) for pending I-485 is March 26th, 2007.....
We have the exact same situation down to the receipt date :eek: I was so shocked I almost fell off my chair when I got my email. A completely unexpected surprise but a good surprise, nevertheless.
We have the exact same situation down to the receipt date :eek: I was so shocked I almost fell off my chair when I got my email. A completely unexpected surprise but a good surprise, nevertheless.
2010 in: Premieres, Julie Benz
nonimmi
01-28 05:17 PM
I believe job description is important, not title. As discussed earlier threads, in most Financial companies software programmers have AVP or VP title. That should not matter as long as job responsibilities are same.
more...
ut_jazz
05-08 03:29 PM
My situation is very unusual. I got a notification that the case is here.
�On March 26, 2008, we transferred this case to our SALT LAKE CITY, UT location to conduct the interview that is a standard part of processing�
Another notification on 04/15/08 is �The I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was transferred and is now pending standard processing at a USCIS office.�
I went to SLC immigration office yesterday and the officer told me they don�t have my case and it is in national benefit center and that�s all. He didn�t tell anything more. Then, I call the general line and was transferred to the national benefit center. They told me that the case came back from Salt Lake on 04/15 and I will know a decision in about 60 days which is very generic message. Then, I asked what happened to the interview, he said the application was reviewed and came back with the reviewer note. He didn�t say much why no interview was conducted. He said someone else in the National Benefit Center will review the case to make a decision.
Now, I am very confused on what is going on. I read a lot of posting in different immigration forum last night. It seems very unusual to me. I couldn�t find any case came to local office and then went back to NBC without an interview.
I hope someone can tell me what is going on.
�On March 26, 2008, we transferred this case to our SALT LAKE CITY, UT location to conduct the interview that is a standard part of processing�
Another notification on 04/15/08 is �The I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was transferred and is now pending standard processing at a USCIS office.�
I went to SLC immigration office yesterday and the officer told me they don�t have my case and it is in national benefit center and that�s all. He didn�t tell anything more. Then, I call the general line and was transferred to the national benefit center. They told me that the case came back from Salt Lake on 04/15 and I will know a decision in about 60 days which is very generic message. Then, I asked what happened to the interview, he said the application was reviewed and came back with the reviewer note. He didn�t say much why no interview was conducted. He said someone else in the National Benefit Center will review the case to make a decision.
Now, I am very confused on what is going on. I read a lot of posting in different immigration forum last night. It seems very unusual to me. I couldn�t find any case came to local office and then went back to NBC without an interview.
I hope someone can tell me what is going on.
hair hot girlfriend julie benz
BhanuPriya
01-23 05:06 PM
Could somebody help me review this company.
more...
fromnaija
07-23 10:47 AM
That is correct. If your employer is enrolled in E-verify then he needs to updated your information in that system otherwise just keep the form for record.
One correction - the employer does not update anything in E-Verify. It is a read-only system to the employers to verify the authenticity of document provided by employees.
One correction - the employer does not update anything in E-Verify. It is a read-only system to the employers to verify the authenticity of document provided by employees.
hot Julie Benz at the Golden
jambvan
10-29 08:51 PM
I have received my FP notice one month back and have my appointment scheduled for next tuesday. I haven't received my wife and daughter's FP notice yet. (my daughter is 7 years old)
I called USCIS 2 to 3 times and finally 10 days back they told me that my wife and daughter’s appointment also set for same date as mine and he was not sure why they have not sent me notice yet. USCIS Rep told me that he is going to send me a copy. I haven't received copy yet as of today. I called USCIS again yesterday but they couldn’t see if notice has been sent or not.
I have checked with post office and they haven't received anything either.
I am planning to go to ASC with my family and will see if they could take FP for them along with me. USCIS also suggested same but they can't guarantee if ASC will take it or not.
Has anyone experienced this before? Please let me know if you have any suggestions. Thank you!
Update: I went to ASC office yesterday and they gave me copy of FP notice for my wife and daughter from their system without any hesitation.
I called USCIS 2 to 3 times and finally 10 days back they told me that my wife and daughter’s appointment also set for same date as mine and he was not sure why they have not sent me notice yet. USCIS Rep told me that he is going to send me a copy. I haven't received copy yet as of today. I called USCIS again yesterday but they couldn’t see if notice has been sent or not.
I have checked with post office and they haven't received anything either.
I am planning to go to ASC with my family and will see if they could take FP for them along with me. USCIS also suggested same but they can't guarantee if ASC will take it or not.
Has anyone experienced this before? Please let me know if you have any suggestions. Thank you!
Update: I went to ASC office yesterday and they gave me copy of FP notice for my wife and daughter from their system without any hesitation.
more...
house Julie Benz Biography News
gk_2000
06-23 06:35 PM
No effect of all this.. they may as well blast from their rear ends
tattoo JulieBenz3.jpg Julie Benz
sodh
07-24 06:47 PM
so far i've been the ones to pay everything...i know govt got stricter this year and now it HAS to be employer who pays....so i'm in bad place as I know how my employer is...
You can alway's pay cash.
You can alway's pay cash.
more...
pictures julie benz facebook
rkumar28
07-30 09:11 AM
Hi Experts,
My GC finally recently got approved and have following questions:
• If I don’t work for my current employer for at least six months after the approval, what kind of issues comes up when applying for citizenship later. What is the law.
• Do we have to submit six months paystubs or yearly W2s.
All I am just trying to get a knowledge on this.
My GC finally recently got approved and have following questions:
• If I don’t work for my current employer for at least six months after the approval, what kind of issues comes up when applying for citizenship later. What is the law.
• Do we have to submit six months paystubs or yearly W2s.
All I am just trying to get a knowledge on this.
dresses Julie Benz Picture amp; Photo
mmk123
01-25 04:08 PM
Query on behalf of a friend -
What are the timelines for I-539 Change of Status for H1 to H4?
Is premium processing option available for the this change of status?
Friend worked till last week of pregnancy (clean H1 history before). Her 12 weeks of maternity leave is ending soon and looks like the family needs to pay attention to child's condition and she has no choice but to become a full-time mom (another full-time job in itself though). She was in status during her maternity leave (some part of which was covered by STD insurance, remaining unpaid leave totaling 12 weeks under FMLA). She needs to change her status from H1 to H4.
What are the timelines for I-539 Change of Status for H1 to H4?
Is premium processing option available for the this change of status?
Friend worked till last week of pregnancy (clean H1 history before). Her 12 weeks of maternity leave is ending soon and looks like the family needs to pay attention to child's condition and she has no choice but to become a full-time mom (another full-time job in itself though). She was in status during her maternity leave (some part of which was covered by STD insurance, remaining unpaid leave totaling 12 weeks under FMLA). She needs to change her status from H1 to H4.
more...
makeup Julie Benz
EB3June03
06-28 12:06 AM
Folks,
I want to find out if the remarks section of the I-693 form should be filled in by the civil surgeon for applicant who has LTBI and according to CDC is recommended to go for Evaluation for Treatment for TB.
From USCIS website:-
USCIS - Questions & Answers:<br>Changes to the Tuberculosis and Vaccination Requirements Required for Adjustment of Status (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1758d5b07655b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=da3eaca797e63110VgnVCM1000004718190a RCRD)
Q: Both the CDC and USCIS have revised their requirements for medical referrals, as notated on Form I-693. In what instances must the referral section in Part 3 be completed?
Only complete Part 3, Referral to Health Department or Other Doctor / Facility, if the referral was required, such as when a Class A condition is suspected and needs further evaluation. Do not complete Part 3 if the referral was merely recommended by the CDC. Instead notate the (recommended but not required) referral in the Remarks box under that particular disease or disorder. This will help alleviate the possibility of USCIS rejecting the Form I-693 due to an erroneous assumption that a follow-up evaluation was needed before completion of the form
I know the Part 3 should NOT be filled by the civil surgeon if the applicant has Class B latent TB. (PPD positive) AND X Rays clear of any Active TB.
If the remarks section is NOT filled in, would there be any problems? Civil surgeon has marked Part 2 with Skin test positive and the size of the induration. Also, he has marked the X Rays normal but he has NOT filled in the Remarks section. I hope that is OK.
I want to find out if the remarks section of the I-693 form should be filled in by the civil surgeon for applicant who has LTBI and according to CDC is recommended to go for Evaluation for Treatment for TB.
From USCIS website:-
USCIS - Questions & Answers:<br>Changes to the Tuberculosis and Vaccination Requirements Required for Adjustment of Status (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1758d5b07655b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=da3eaca797e63110VgnVCM1000004718190a RCRD)
Q: Both the CDC and USCIS have revised their requirements for medical referrals, as notated on Form I-693. In what instances must the referral section in Part 3 be completed?
Only complete Part 3, Referral to Health Department or Other Doctor / Facility, if the referral was required, such as when a Class A condition is suspected and needs further evaluation. Do not complete Part 3 if the referral was merely recommended by the CDC. Instead notate the (recommended but not required) referral in the Remarks box under that particular disease or disorder. This will help alleviate the possibility of USCIS rejecting the Form I-693 due to an erroneous assumption that a follow-up evaluation was needed before completion of the form
I know the Part 3 should NOT be filled by the civil surgeon if the applicant has Class B latent TB. (PPD positive) AND X Rays clear of any Active TB.
If the remarks section is NOT filled in, would there be any problems? Civil surgeon has marked Part 2 with Skin test positive and the size of the induration. Also, he has marked the X Rays normal but he has NOT filled in the Remarks section. I hope that is OK.
girlfriend julie benz saw 5
pani_6
02-25 01:36 PM
I have EAD and AP and expired H1-b stamp ..although h1 b is valid..can any of you tell me please if I need a Transit Visa through Frankfurt
hairstyles Julie Benz updo hairstyle at
Blog Feeds
01-20 07:00 AM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
In a letter to Senator Grassley, the CIS defended their H-1B adjudication practices and their everything under the kitchen sink Request for Evidences.
The CIS is looking into revising the form I-129 to have Petitioner and beneficiary both attest that:
The beneficiary has been advised of the offsite placement and accepts the terms of the H-IB employment, including the job location and possible relocation;
Really? Does anyone working for the software industry not know that they have to work off site. These people are always traveling, the beneficiary KNOWS they have to work off site. Same with Oil Company Engineers. Its the nature of their work. Does CIS seriously think the beneficiary does not know?
2. Placement of the beneficiary offsite during the period of employment will be in compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements of the H-IB nonimmigrant classification;
3. The beneficiary will be paid the prevailing rate of pay at any offsite
location; and,
This is in line with the question on the I-94 application on the plane, "Are you a terrorist." Has anyone ever answered yes to that question? Similarly, will anyone filing an H-1B petition ever say they will not comply with the law?
4. The work itinerary is attached.
The H-1B is given for 3 years. It is difficult to predict the itinerary for all those 3 years. If the work itinerary is for less than 3 years, then the employer has to file the whole H-1B again, with the high fees. And even if they have the work itinerary, the job may be canceled, etc. So what is the point of private employers filing job itineraries with the Government?
All of this simply penalizes the small employers who form the backbone of the American economy.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-2731884981154177550?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/12/h-1b-and-cis.html)
In a letter to Senator Grassley, the CIS defended their H-1B adjudication practices and their everything under the kitchen sink Request for Evidences.
The CIS is looking into revising the form I-129 to have Petitioner and beneficiary both attest that:
The beneficiary has been advised of the offsite placement and accepts the terms of the H-IB employment, including the job location and possible relocation;
Really? Does anyone working for the software industry not know that they have to work off site. These people are always traveling, the beneficiary KNOWS they have to work off site. Same with Oil Company Engineers. Its the nature of their work. Does CIS seriously think the beneficiary does not know?
2. Placement of the beneficiary offsite during the period of employment will be in compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements of the H-IB nonimmigrant classification;
3. The beneficiary will be paid the prevailing rate of pay at any offsite
location; and,
This is in line with the question on the I-94 application on the plane, "Are you a terrorist." Has anyone ever answered yes to that question? Similarly, will anyone filing an H-1B petition ever say they will not comply with the law?
4. The work itinerary is attached.
The H-1B is given for 3 years. It is difficult to predict the itinerary for all those 3 years. If the work itinerary is for less than 3 years, then the employer has to file the whole H-1B again, with the high fees. And even if they have the work itinerary, the job may be canceled, etc. So what is the point of private employers filing job itineraries with the Government?
All of this simply penalizes the small employers who form the backbone of the American economy.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-2731884981154177550?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/12/h-1b-and-cis.html)
darshan1226
04-03 11:34 AM
Hello all,
I had my 140 reinstated in Feb-09 after it was denied back in 08 (filed motion to reopen). Last week i inquired about the status of my case since my visa category is current (VB 02/2003), I received a letter yesterday informing me that the case is out of the processing date, my 140 priority date is 12/2002. is this a mistake or my priority date has change to feb-09?
I had my 140 reinstated in Feb-09 after it was denied back in 08 (filed motion to reopen). Last week i inquired about the status of my case since my visa category is current (VB 02/2003), I received a letter yesterday informing me that the case is out of the processing date, my 140 priority date is 12/2002. is this a mistake or my priority date has change to feb-09?
milindt
03-11 11:54 PM
My in-laws came to visit us on vistor visa(B1/B2) .
They got 6 month of stay in their I-94.
My father-in-law left US 2 day's before I -94 expiry but with my mother-in-law's I-94. Before he left I applied for the extension of stay(I539) for my Mother-in-law.
Her I-539 got denied stating the person has already left.
Now in my mother-in-law's passport we have my father-in-law's I-94. So actually at the port of entry the officer switched the I-94's.
Now the question is now how to handle the denial of extension for mother-in-law and get new I-94? and what to do with father-in-law's I-94.
They got 6 month of stay in their I-94.
My father-in-law left US 2 day's before I -94 expiry but with my mother-in-law's I-94. Before he left I applied for the extension of stay(I539) for my Mother-in-law.
Her I-539 got denied stating the person has already left.
Now in my mother-in-law's passport we have my father-in-law's I-94. So actually at the port of entry the officer switched the I-94's.
Now the question is now how to handle the denial of extension for mother-in-law and get new I-94? and what to do with father-in-law's I-94.
No comments:
Post a Comment